CHANGING IDEALS:
REFORMATION AND PUNISHMENT
Third in a series
about the Old Don Jail
By Elizabeth
Abbott
Construction of the new jail was
dogged by one crisis after another. The decision taken to begin by building the
central block and two wings. The site of the new Don Jail was also chosen, city
land across the
Construction began and with it, one
crisis after another. The Police Board was demanding, meeting on the work site
and issuing unauthorized orders on the spot; unfortunately, Thomas obediently
followed them. In addition, the project was bogged down in delays caused by his
alcohol-clouded, incompetent project supervisor, Thomas Young, and by
fraudulent work. Costs skyrocketed and tempers flared. Thomas was reprimanded
and Young was fired; later, City Council appointed Thomas’ architect son,
William Tutin Thomas, to replace Young.
From Canada's Oldest Profession: Sex Work and Bawdy House Legislation |
This new arrangement did not
immediately reinvigorate the project. Instead, the Provincial Prison
Inspectors, a newly appointed body, pored over Thomas’ plans and evaluated them
according to their agenda of cleansing the filth of Upper Canadian jails where,
they reported, “We do not punish, or we punish improperly. We do not deter from
crime, and we do not reform the criminal.”[2]
The Inspectors concluded that there were several ways to reform
Next issue: Father Time Watches Over the Physical Plant